Thursday, December 13, 2007

Tax Inequality Affect All..The Poor & Rich

Subject: The Call To Raise Taxes Affects Everyone...Even the poor



It distresses me to hear "The rich need to pay their fair share of taxes." Why? Because it is discriminatory. Period.

Everyone who pays a flat percentage of a tax, whether rich or poor, pays a fair tax. 10 percent of nothing is nothing. 10 percent of $100 is $10. It is an equal imposition of taxes.

To say that the rich should pay more only means that the door opens to make other identified groups as deserving of paying more in taxes.

How can you provide free services to people where only a few benefit from the free service? Who pays for the free services rendered to others? People other than the recipients of the free services.

I do not know about you, but I never qualified for anything free: free lunch for my kids, tuition, etc. I just happened to make over a certain about of income. Yet, I live from pay check to pay check! That is my right. Why should I be penalized for it?

If I do not have children under the tax code, I pay more taxes as a single individual. This is unfair to be penalized for not having children. If I have a lot of children, I do not have to pay a lot of taxes. Is that fair? I think not.

If you inherit a business that your relatives worked hard to succeed, and that relative dies, the IRS takes over 50% in taxes of that business. The heirs do not benefit. There is no legacy. The government puts its hands into the pockets of the family, robbing it of the fruits of the patriarch or matriarch's labors.

People of America wake up. If they tax the guy you do not like, watch out that you are not the next guy that is not liked and must pay a penalty tax that no one else is required to pay.

Too many in America have forgotten the Boston Tea Party. Our freedoms are being lost to politics and special interests. Yet, too many people want the rich to pay more than they themselves pay.

I have never know a poor person to provide jobs to others. But, the USA tax system is willing to tax the job creator above and beyond everyone else to make a point.
Has anyone thought about the ability of the job creator to create job? Take away that ability because of taxation and the result is fewer jobs because the money that could be paid to someone goes to the government coffers.

What the tax levy authorities do not realize is that, as long as money exchanges hands, it promotes economic growth. Money changing hands creates more revenue. More revenue means a greater increase in the creation of jobs. The greater creation of jobs means the increase in the creation of revenue..

What candidate do you think is proposing fairness that equally benefits everyone?



No comments: